opinion

Regarding: .XXX TLD

Editor's note: The following is a letter sent by noted adult industry attorneys J. D. Obenberger and Reed Lee to ICANN, outlining some of the reasons that the "dot xxx" TLD should not be adopted. A well thought out, logical and eloquent statement, I present it for your consideration:

We are Free Speech lawyers in Chicago with considerable experience in defending criminal obscenity cases and in providing advice and guidance to the ongoing operations of adult-oriented, erotic websites. We write on our own behalf rather than on behalf of any particular client, though it is my strong impression that the large majority of our clients embrace the sentiments expressed in this letter.

We write in opposition to the creation and implementation of the proposed .xxx Top Level Domain.

As we all know, the Internet has now begun radically transforming the way the human race communicates and indeed the way that mankind looks at itself. It dramatically changes the way individuals look at this world and the people in it. It is an instrument of knowledge, persuasion, and transformation of a dimension never seen before.

The Internet is the realm of commerce and industry, science and technology, and the arts and humanities alike. As an information highway, it serves the mature and adult purposes of the world and it grows to serve them better. The technical means established for this function must be designed with that mature and adult purpose in mind.

Those who would aspire to make the Internet safe for children should better consider how autobahns and interstate highways might be safe for children to play upon. Massive trucks, sometimes carrying toxic substances, barrel along these thoroughfares on a constant and unremitting basis, and that is frankly one of the chief purposes behind the construction of highways. To render the interstate highways safe for children at play by banning such traffic would deprive society of the adult purpose behind the road. The place for children to play is in designated and protected places that are not in the midst of adult traffic.

As the Internet grows in acceptance, penetration, utility, and effectiveness - as it becomes more necessary in the affairs of the world - there are those parochial interests that wish to control the content and appeal of the information content. Some wish to do so for political reasons and others for social or moral reasons. (In the end, they will all fail, for there is no stopping ideas, arguments, and truth.)

Some have argued for the logical segregation of erotic and/or sexually-oriented materials into a separate top-level domain. Some of them plot and plan for the censorship of such material once the domain has been created and its use made mandatory by local law. The creation of such a TLD is the necessary first step in such a plan and this is where the enterprise should be halted. The existence of such a domain facilitates Internet filtering by moralistic governments with the aim of affecting the ideas and concepts their residents may see and the alternative moral schemes to which they are exposed. The segregation of thought, entertainment, and ideas because of content and appeal is a dangerous first step towards local and parochial control over the global Internet. It paves the way for TLDs aimed at religious and political content.

Finally, I must note that an enormous amount of money and time has been spent in the promotion of this enterprise by those who stand to profit from it. Because there is essentially no demand for this TLD from within the adult Internet industry, it can only be surmised that their business plan includes cross-registrations from existing adult .com TLD registrants in order to protect against infringing use of a domain name in the .xxx TLD - and the potential gold mine of legally mandated use the TLD. Both of these income streams are created or potentially created because of fear or coercion arising merely because the proposed TLD will exist. My own sense of ethics suggests that what the promoters are foisting on ICANN amounts to a disreputable business scheme of creating profit from a thing of no legitimate value whatsoever to any person.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More Articles

opinion

Breaking Down HB 805 and How it Affects the Adult Industry

North Carolina House Bill 805 was enacted July 29, after the state legislature overrode Governor Josh Stein’s veto. The provisions that relate to the adult industry, imposing requirements for age verification, consent and content removal, are scheduled to become effective Dec. 1. Platforms have until then to update their policies and systems to comply with the new regulations.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
opinion

How to Avoid Copyright Pitfalls When Using Music in Adult Content

When creating an adult video, bringing your vision to life often means assembling just the right ingredients — including the right music. However, adding music to adult content can raise complex legal and ethical issues.

Lawrence G. Walters ·
opinion

Fighting Back Against AI-Fueled Fake Takedown Notices

The digital landscape is increasingly being shaped by artificial intelligence, and while AI offers immense potential, it’s also being weaponized. One disturbing trend that directly impacts adult businesses is AI-powered “DMCA takedown services” generating a flood of fraudulent Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) notices.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
opinion

What the New SCOTUS Ruling Means for AV Laws and Free Speech

On June 27, 2025, the United States Supreme Court handed down its landmark decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, upholding Texas’ age verification law in the face of a constitutional challenge and setting a new precedent that bolsters similar laws around the country.

Lawrence G. Walters ·
opinion

How the Interstate Obscenity Definition Act Could Impact Adult Businesses

Congress is considering a bill that would change the well-settled definition of obscenity and create extensive new risks for the adult industry. The Interstate Obscenity Definition Act, introduced by Sen. Mike Lee, makes a mockery of the First Amendment and should be roundly rejected.

Lawrence G. Walters ·
opinion

What France's New Law Means for Age Verification Worldwide

When France implemented its Security and Regulation of the Digital Space (SREN) law on April 11, it marked a pivotal moment in the ongoing global debate surrounding online safety and access to adult content.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
opinion

Consent Guardrails: How to Protect Your Content Platform

The adult industry takes a strong and definite stance against the creation or publication of nonconsensual materials. Adult industry creators, producers, processors, banks and hosts all share a vested interest in ensuring that the recording and publication of sexually explicit content is supported by informed consent.

Lawrence G. Walters ·
opinion

The SCREEN Test: How to Prepare for Federal Age Verification

For those who are counting, there are now 20 enacted state laws in the United States requiring age verification for viewing online adult content, plus numerous proposed laws in the works. This ongoing barrage has been exhausting for many in the adult industry — and it may be about to escalate in the form of a potential new AV law, this time at the federal level.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
opinion

Protecting Content Ownership Rights When Using AI

In today’s digital age, content producers have more tools at their disposal than ever before. Among these tools, artificial intelligence (AI) content generation has emerged as a game changer, enabling creators to produce high-quality content quickly and efficiently.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
opinion

Understanding 'Indemnification' in Business Contracts

Clients frequently tell me that they didn’t understand — or sometimes, even read — certain portions of a contract because those sections appeared to be just “standard legalese.” They are referring, of course, to the specialized language used in legal documents, including contracts.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
Show More